Some 18 months ago I have reported on a standardization project within IEC TC 57 defining web services as a second SCSM (Specific Communication Service Mapping) for IEC 61850. In the meantime it seems very likely that a mapping to XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) will be used as the only mapping in the future IEC 61850-8-2.
The secretary of IEC TC 57 has presented a slide (slide 5) with the following requirements during a public event at the Hannover Messe 2014:
- “Part 8-2 Specific communication service mapping (SCSM) – Mappings to web protocols
- Comply with the new edition of IEC 61850-7-1, IEC 61850-7-2, IEC 61850-7-3, and IEC 61850-7-4
- Support the existing application data model defined in IEC 61850-7-410, 7-420 and 61400-25-2
- Identify which web services specification should be considered to deploy cyber-security, in conjunction with IEC TC 57 WG 15 work
- complementary to the existing SCSM (8-1), not competing”
He reported on the status of work: “Konsens bei XMPP als Lösung” (consensus to apply XMPP as solution).
Click HERE for the complete presentation of the secretary of IEC TC 57 during the Hannover Messe 2014 [German, pdf]
MMS messages encoded in XML (XER – XML Encoding Rules for ASN.1, ISO 8825-4) may be used as payload of the XMPP messages.
What would that mean for IEC 61850-8-1 (MMS ASN.1 BER encoded messaging) implementations? First: the 8-1 solutions would continue to be used. Second: an additional ASN.1 encoding rule would add some software at the encoding layer … and finally the addition of the “transport or middle layer” XMMP would offer a new “transport mechanism”. That’s it.
This way most of the IEC 61850 related software (API, datasets, reporting, logging, control, system configuration language, modeling and models, …) would be used unchanged!
By the way, using ASN.1 XER in addition to BER has been proposed and discussed some 20 years ago within ISO TC 184 SC5 WG2. It was too early.
Since MMS is independent of encoding, there seems to be no (technical) question to using XER.
No comments:
Post a Comment